Disguising a Military Object as a Civilian Object: Prohibited Perfidy or Permissible Ruse of War?
Main author: | Heller, Jon |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Online access: |
Click here to view record |
id |
eprints-21560 |
---|---|
recordtype |
eprints |
institution |
SOAS, University of London |
collection |
SOAS Research Online |
language |
English |
language_search |
English |
description |
A number of scholars have claimed that it is inherently perfidious to kill an enemy soldier by disguising a military object as a civilian object. This essay disagrees, noting that conventional and customary IHL deem at least five military practices that involve making a military object appear to be a civilian object permissible ruses of war, not prohibited acts of perfidy: camouflage, ambush, cover, booby-traps, and landmines. The essay thus argues that attackers are free to disguise a military object as a civilian object as long as the civilian object in question does not receive special protection under international humanitarian law. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Heller, Jon |
author_facet |
Heller, Jon |
authorStr |
Heller, Jon |
author_letter |
Heller, Jon |
title |
Disguising a Military Object as a Civilian Object: Prohibited Perfidy or Permissible Ruse of War? |
publisher |
U.S. Naval War College |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/21560/
|