Ethical guidance or epistemological injustice? The quality and usefulness of ethical guidance for humanitarian workers and agencies.
Main author: | Sheather, Julian |
---|---|
Other authors: | Apunyo, RonaldDuBois, MarcKhondaker, RumaNoman, AbdullahalSadique, SohanaMcGowan, Catherine R |
Format: | Journal Article |
Online access: |
Click here to view record |
id |
eprints-36973 |
---|---|
recordtype |
eprints |
institution |
SOAS, University of London |
collection |
SOAS Research Online |
language |
English |
language_search |
English |
description |
This paper explores the quality and usefulness of ethical guidance for humanitarian aid workers and their agencies. We focus specifically on public health emergencies, such as COVID-19. The authors undertook a literature review and gathered empirical data through semi-structured focus group discussions amongst front-line workers from health clinics in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh and in the Abyei Special Administrative Area, South Sudan. The purpose of the project was to identify how front-line workers respond to ethical challenges, including any informal or local decision-making processes, support networks, or habits of response.The research findings highlighted a dissonance between ethical guidance and the experiences of front-line humanitarian health workers. They suggest the possibility: (1) that few problems confronting front-line workers are conceived, described, or resolved as ethical problems; and (2) of significant dissonance between available, allegedly practically oriented guidance (often produced by academics in North America and Europe), and the immediate issues confronting front-line workers. The literature review and focus group data suggest a real possibility that there is, at best, a significant epistemic gulf between those who produce ethical guidelines and those engaged in real-time problem solving at the point of contact with people. At worst they suggest a form of epistemic control-an imposition of cognitive shapes that shoehorn the round peg of theoretical preoccupations and the disciplinary boundaries of western academies into the square hole of front-line humanitarian practice. [Abstract copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.] |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Sheather, Julian |
author_facet |
Sheather, Julian Apunyo, Ronald DuBois, Marc Khondaker, Ruma Noman, Abdullahal Sadique, Sohana McGowan, Catherine R |
authorStr |
Sheather, Julian |
author_letter |
Sheather, Julian |
author2 |
Apunyo, Ronald DuBois, Marc Khondaker, Ruma Noman, Abdullahal Sadique, Sohana McGowan, Catherine R |
author2Str |
Apunyo, Ronald DuBois, Marc Khondaker, Ruma Noman, Abdullahal Sadique, Sohana McGowan, Catherine R |
title |
Ethical guidance or epistemological injustice? The quality and usefulness of ethical guidance for humanitarian workers and agencies. |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/36973/
|