Staff view:

id	eprints-34413
recordtype	eprints
institution	SOAS, University of London
collection	SOAS Research Online
language	English
language_search	English
topic	D History (General) HQ The family. Marriage. Women KL Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica
description	Trial transcripts remain an under utilised source through which colonial women’s lived experiences as well as their narratives of resistance can be recovered. This paper aims to explore Indian Hindu women’s resistance to attempts to control their bodies through the legal notions of age of consent, as well as restitution of conjugal rights, as they came to be debated in the case of Dadaji Bhikaji vs Rukhmabai (1885). The colonial state in India collaborated with the patriarchal elements of the Hindu religion to deny Hindu women any right to withhold consent to marriage, or to withhold consent to sexual intercourse with their husbands after the age of ten. In colonial law, Hindu marriage came to be recognised as a sacrament and not a contract, thus precluding any need for the consent of the bride or the groom to deem a marriage valid.
author_additional	Bonnerjee, Samraghni
author_additionalStr	Bonnerjee, Samraghni
format	Book Chapters
author	Sharma, Kanika
author_facet	Sharma, Kanika
authorStr	Sharma, Kanika
author_letter	Sharma, Kanika
title	Restitution of conjugal rights and the dissenting female body: The Rukhmabai Case
publisher	Routledge
publishDate	2020
url	https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/34413/