| id |
eprints-31597
|
| recordtype |
eprints
|
| institution |
SOAS, University of London
|
| collection |
SOAS Research Online
|
| language |
English
|
| language_search |
English
|
| description |
This article addresses a key problem confronted by immigration judges (IJs) in their assessment of the asylum claims of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children – who are often not allowed to speak or participate in their own hearings – namely the manner in which asylum legal procedure is intertwined with an IJ’s decision to refuse the claim on the basis of adverse credibility. This article has three linked aims: to examine research that looks at how IJs decide credibility; to set out an ethnographic approach to better understand IJs’ decision-making; and to argue that asylum tribunals need to adopt appropriate guidelines.
|
| format |
Journal Article
|
| author |
Campbell, John
|
| author_facet |
Campbell, John
|
| authorStr |
Campbell, John
|
| author_letter |
Campbell, John
|
| title |
Examining Procedural Unfairness and Credibility Findings in the UK Asylum System
|
| publisher |
Oxford University Press
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/31597/
|
