Justifications of Freedom of Speech:Towards a Double-grounded Non-consequentialist Approach

Main author: Kabasakal Badamchi, Devrim
Format: Journal Article           
Online access: Click here to view record


id eprints-31569
recordtype eprints
institution SOAS, University of London
collection SOAS Research Online
language English
language_search English
description This article aims to develop a ground for freedom of speech that combines two justifications – democratic participation and autonomy. First, it is argued that consequentialist justifications, such as discovery of truth and personal development, are far from providing a strong justification for free speech due to their reliance on uncertain empirical validation. Second, it is claimed that a stronger and better ground for free speech can be constructed by articulating two non-consequentialist justifications for free speech – democratic participation and autonomy. This articulation, which I call the double-grounded non-consequentialist justification for free speech, considers autonomy and democratic participation as complementary principles. In this sense, a double-grounded justification engages justification as autonomy and democratic participation in a dialogue in order to provide remedies for the specific weaknesses of these two positions.
format Journal Article
author Kabasakal Badamchi, Devrim
author_facet Kabasakal Badamchi, Devrim
authorStr Kabasakal Badamchi, Devrim
author_letter Kabasakal Badamchi, Devrim
title Justifications of Freedom of Speech:Towards a Double-grounded Non-consequentialist Approach
publisher Sage
publishDate 2015
url https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/31569/