Arab Constitutionalism and the Formalism of Authoritarian Constitutionalism

Click here to view record
Main author: Sultany, Nimer
Format: Book Chapters           
Online access: Click here to view record


id eprints-30474
recordtype eprints
institution SOAS, University of London
collection SOAS Research Online
language English
language_search English
topic K Law (General)
K Law
description This chapter challenges different manifestations of a ‘formalist’ approach to constitutional theory. The formalist approach deploys several labels and distinctions (constitutions without constitutionalism, authoritarian, ideological, instrumentalist and temporary) that question the constitutional legitimacy of non-North American and non-Western European constitutions because these are considered as merely political instruments lacking the supremacy and rigidity of higher law. This approach is formalist in two senses: it is overly focused on the text (or constitutional form), and it assumes that abstract categories determine the constitutional content or practice. Ottoman and Arab constitutionmaking, the subject of this chapter, illustrates that this formalist approach is deficient because it is impervious to constitutional and political practice. As such, and while ‘ideological’ is often used in the ‘positive’ sense to convey a system of ideas, it has negative ‘ideological’ effects because it juxtaposes these constitutions to an idealised version of liberal constitutions (understood as ‘normative’, suprapolitical constitutions) and discounts constitutional experiences that fall outside the North American and European orbits.
author_additional Alvar Garcia, Helena
author_additionalStr Alvar Garcia, Helena
format Book Chapters
author Sultany, Nimer
author_facet Sultany, Nimer
authorStr Sultany, Nimer
author_letter Sultany, Nimer
title Arab Constitutionalism and the Formalism of Authoritarian Constitutionalism
publisher Edward Elgar
publishDate 2019
url https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/30474/

Similar items