Is Co-Worker Feedback More Important than Supervisor Feedback for Increasing Innovative Behavior?

Main author: Eva, Nathan
Other authors: Meacham, Hannah
Newman, Alexander
Schwarz, Gary
Tham, Tse Leng
Format: Journal Article           
Online access: Click here to view record


Summary: A growing body of research explores human resource management practices that encourage employees to innovate. In this study, we examine the links between different sources of feedback (supervisor and co-worker) and employees’ innovative behavior. Drawing on social exchange theory and the job demands-resources theory, we first propose that work engagement and psychological contract breach mediate the relationship between supervisor feedback and employees’ innovative behavior. Second, we propose a moderated-mediation model in which co-worker feedback attenuates the relationships between supervisor feedback and employees’ innovative behavior through the mediating mechanisms of both work engagement and psychological contract breach. Using three waves of multi-source data from 300 Chinese employees and their 64 supervisors, we found a dual-mediation pathway by which employees’ work engagement and perceptions of psychological contract breach mediate the influence of supervisor feedback on innovative behavior. Our results also show that co-worker feedback can be used to supplement the lack of supervisor feedback when required. Organizations are advised to ensure that employees obtain regular feedback from multiple sources because such feedback can promote employees’ work engagement and perceptions that the organization is upholding its side of the psychological contract, which fosters employees’ innovative behavior.
Other authors: Meacham, Hannah, Newman, Alexander, Schwarz, Gary, Tham, Tse Leng
Language: English
Published: Wiley 2019