Asylum vs sovereignty in the 21st century: How nation-state's breach international law to block access to asylum.

Main author: Campbell, John
Format: Journal Article           
Online access: Click here to view record


id eprints-21493
recordtype eprints
institution SOAS, University of London
collection SOAS Research Online
language English
language_search English
description Asylum was created by the international community in the 20th century to provide legal protection to individuals fleeing persecution by nation states; but the ability to secure asylum has been fundamentally reshaped by sovereign national interests in the 21st century. This paper has two objectives. First it explores the various ways in which nation-states have adopted policies and pursued agendas which prevent asylum seekers from gaining access to countries of asylum, which criminalize many who enter a country of asylum and which frustrate their ability to obtain asylum. When state signatories breach their legal obligations to the Refugee Convention, the UNHCR has the authority to exercise its ‘supervisory role’ to bring states’ back into compliance. I examine two UNHCR interventions in the United Kingdom which have failed. The paper concludes by discussing how and why it is necessary to radically rethink national asylum and migration policies.
format Journal Article
author Campbell, John
author_facet Campbell, John
authorStr Campbell, John
author_letter Campbell, John
title Asylum vs sovereignty in the 21st century: How nation-state's breach international law to block access to asylum.
publisher Inderscience
publishDate 2015
url https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/21493/